Monday, July 2, 2007

Great buzz at Ealing Southall


I have just spent a wonderful day at Ealing Southall. My photo shows some of the recent leaflets which have been distributed, as well as moi, in the HQ.

It was marvellous to see the largest HQ in LibDem by-election history with a real buzz about it, with Nigel Bakhai and his team firing on all cylinders.

Even though today was a rainy Monday, the visitors' book was choc-a-bloc with volunteers who were out and about doing residents' surveys, canvassing, delivering leaflets etc. There were many MPs' names in the book and I saw at least six MPs coming and going at the HQ.

I carried out Community Surveys with Imran Ali and Lady Rennard. I also had a few "breathers" doing clerical work alongside the likes of Don Foster MP, who is a very cheery fellow.

All in all, it was a very satisfying day, despite doing a drowned rat impersonation at one point, and it was very uplifting to see such a vibrant and efficient by-election operation in full swing.

Remarkable photos of Glasgow bombers

There are some remarkable photographs of the Glasgow bombers in the papers today. The Sun shows an off-duty policeman hosing down the bomber who was on fire, and the same bomber lying on the ground, having been arrested.

The main news this morning is that two of the suspects are doctors. One of those was apparently stopped on the M6 after coming up on one of the new number plate recognition cameras.

Obama ahead of Clinton on funds

The latest fund-raising figures in the US Presidential campaign, have been eagerly awaited. They can be crucial in indicating who is in the lead and who is faltering.

Barack Obama has raised $32.5 million between April and June. This is well ahead of Clinton's $27 million. This is a very significant achievement for Obama. The Clintons are no slouches when it comes to raising funds.

Interestingly, the Obama money is coming significantly from internet donations and the "grass roots", whereas, according to The Times, the Clinton money is coming largely from "mining the list of established donors who backed her husband."

Sunday, July 1, 2007

Quiz question in the making - sons of Bishops in pop music

After coming up with "triplet" Trivial Pursuit questions about celebrities who wrote famous advertising slogans and ones who were jailed, I have another one on the go:

Name three Bishops' children who are famous in the pop music business

So far I have come up with two:

Radio One DJ Tim Westwood is the son of the former Bishop of Peterborough.

Divine Comedy frontman Neil Hannon is the son of the former Bishop of Clogher. (The "ecclesiastical connections do not end there - Divine Comedy performed the theme tune for Channel Four's Father Ted).

I am desperate for a third....sadly there probably isn't one.

Lauren Laverne is no Fern Cotton - thank goodness

I couldn't summon up enough enthusiasm to watch Fern Cotton interviewing the Princes, but I could empathise with the Norfolk Blogger's pain on witnessing the spectacle.

I woke up last night in my armchair and was drowsily conscious of the last few minutes of Lou Reed being interviewed on the BBC's Culture Show. I thought: "It's Fern Cotton again doing the interview - haven't the BBC got anyone else?"

When I became fully conscious I found out that the interviewer was, in fact, Lauren Laverne. Looking at their photos, my confusion is understandable.


I think I traduced Laverne by comparing her to Cotton. Watching the interview through, she actually did a very good job. Reed is a notoriously difficult interviewee, but on this occasion the output wasn't bad, as you can see below.


Supreme Court pay-back time for Bushs Senior and Junior

It is one of the vagaries of the US constitution that patient amassing of US Supreme Court appointees over many years can make a fundamental difference to the country's law-making.

Even though Gerald Ford is dead, his appointee to the Supreme Court, John Stevens, still sits on the bench. Ronald Reagan is long gone but Messrs Scalia and Kennedy, who he appointed, carry on in the Supreme Court. So do two of G.H.W.Bush's (Senior) appointees.

Whether or not the judges are appointed by a Republican President is no guarantee of a conservatism as judges, as Day O'Connor and Souter have shown.

However, with the replacement of Day O'Connor with Alito, in the last week, the shift of power to a clear conservative agenda has become evident in the decisions of the court on subjects such as:

School integration
Abortion
Campaigns
Discrimination
Students' free speech

Erwin Chemerinsky, a liberal Duke University law professor, comments:

This was the year the conservatives finally got their court. Roberts and Alito have been everything conservatives could have hoped for and everything liberals could have feared.

The man who is pulling George Bush's strings

The Washington Post has published a major four-part investigation and assessment of Dick Cheney. Entitled "The Angler" it collates a fascinating picture of the US Vice-President.

The opening of the first part of this Barton Gellman and Jo Becker series, is stunning. It reveals that Cheney basically got Bush to sign the order for foreign terrorist suspects to be tried by military tribunal without the Secretary of State (Colin Powell) or the National Security Adviser (Condeleeza Rice) knowing anything about it. That is significant, given that several years later the first case at such a tribunal collapsed. Perhaps if more advisers had discussed the order before its approval, all those years of agony would have been avoided.

The series clearly illustrates that Cheney's role is unlike that of any previous Vice-President. Rather than agreeing to keep to a limited range of portfolios...

Cheney preferred, and Bush approved, a mandate that gave him access to "every table and every meeting," making his voice heard in "whatever area the vice president feels he wants to be active in," Joshua B Bolten (White House Chief of Staff) said.

Cheney has used that mandate with singular force of will. Other recent vice presidents have enjoyed a standing invitation to join the president at "policy time." But Cheney's interventions have also come in the president's absence, at Cabinet and sub-Cabinet levels where his predecessors were seldom seen. He found pressure points and changed the course of events by "reaching down," a phrase that recurs often in interviews with current and former aides.

It is particularly illuminating to read Cheney's role in the changing of the definition of torture by the Bush administration. This change appears to have its origins in the so-called "Torture memo", which was a documented opinion from the US Justice Department which narrowed the definition of "torture" to mean only suffering "equivalent in intensity" to the pain of "organ failure ..... or even death."

Reading this series one has to ask, again, "Who is actually the President of the United States?" It is clear that Cheney has accumulated power to an extent where it appears that Bush follows his instructions like a lamb following its mother ewe. I know none of this is new, but the Washington Post is remarkable in accumulating a vast array of evidence for this view.